Hypocrisy Now
Receipts, not rants.
Tracking what public figures said then versus what they say now.
Following the money behind the message.
“Russia occupied the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant — Europe's largest — parking military hardware next to reactor units, using it as a fire base, causing eight external power blackouts forcing reliance on emergency diesel generators, and restricting IAEA inspector access for months.”
“These illegal and reckless actions are an indelible stain on the international reputation of those who direct missiles at the Bushehr NPP and other Iranian nuclear facilities under the Agency's safeguards. They have completely undermined their previous standing in the field of nuclear nonproliferation.”
Follow the money
Current funding reporting
No new funding finding has cleared editorial review. The dated dossiers below remain available.
Funding source health: stale. FEC refresh: degraded. Last successful source check 2026-09-23. Manual refresh only. 31 stale source checks. 9 incomplete coverage assertions.
Dated context
Funding dossiers
Crypto regulation
Crypto's $245M Shadow Campaign
Fairshake and its affiliates ran the largest industry super PAC of 2024, and almost never mentioned crypto in the ads.
~$158M tracked
Climate / energy
Drill, Baby, Donate
Oil and gas giants pumped $219M into the 2024 election, then collected policy returns worth billions.
~$20M tracked
Campaign finance
Elon Musk's $290M Political Machine
The world's richest man bet his fortune on Trump, and kept betting after he won.
~$339M tracked
Latest Hypocrisy
Scott Perry
Now:
Built his entire political identity around fiscal conservatism and deficit reduction, then voted for what his own Democratic colleagues called 'the single greatest increase to our national debt in American history'
Senator Schumer
Now:
Projected unified opposition and then reversed within 24 hours, undermining his own party's negotiating position. The rapid flip suggested the original stance was theatrical rather than principled
Democratic Party
Now:
Democrats supported restructuring USAID under Clinton with Biden's explicit vote, then called similar efforts under Trump dictatorial, applying different standards based on which party pursued the reorganization
Vice President Harris
Now:
Took an unequivocal position against fracking during the primary, then reversed it for the general election when it was politically inconvenient, with no substantive policy explanation for the change
Republican Party
Now:
The same party that made eliminating earmarks a signature issue and banned them in 2010 later voted to restore them and used them more aggressively than Democrats, requesting nearly three times more money per earmark
Republican Party
Now:
Voted against infrastructure spending as irresponsible, then sent press releases and held press conferences taking credit for the same spending in their districts, applying different standards depending on whether they were voting or campaigning